Holyoke - With world leaders thinking globally about climate change in Copenhagen this week, scientists were thinking locally about many of the same issues Thursday in Holyoke.
In a public hearing at the Holiday Inn here, details were offered of a landmark research study that will try to gauge the impacts of biomass energy on the climate as well as on the forests of Massachusetts.
With three proposals for industrial-scale wood-burning power plants in the Pioneer Valley, in Springfield, Greenfield and Russell, the six-month study was commissioned in November by the state Department of Energy Resources. It will be conducted by the Manomet Center for Conservation Sciences, a non-profit research center based in Plymouth.
"I think most of us
sperm enhancement pills
high sperm count
improve increase semen
how increase sperm count
low sperm count
natural way to increase sperm count
raise sperm count
ways to increase sperm count
sperm enhancement drugs
sperm enhancement meds
sperm enhancement medications
average sperm count
how to increase sperm count
increase semen volume
increase sperm count naturally
more sperm
man fertility
increase male fertility
remedies to increase sperm count
semen enhancement
male fertility treatment
precoce ejaculation
combat premature ejaculation
control early ejaculation
stop quick ejaculation
delay orgasm men
help for premature ejaculation
stop fast ejaculation
how men can last longer in bed
improve sexual performance
longer sex time
premature ejaculation medicine
make yourself last longer in bed
premature ejaculation pills
premature ejaculation meds
premature ejaculation products
prolong male ejaculation
sexual remedies
last longer pills
overcome ejaculation
avoid ejaculation
avoid early ejaculation
avoid premature ejaculation
control over ejaculation
enjoy long sex
firm erection
herbal remedy for premature ejaculation
remedy for premature ejaculation
improve sexual stamina
last longer during intercourse
longer sexual performance
stop fast ejaculation
pe drugs
pe pills
stimulate penis
natural erectile dysfunction
erectile dysfunction meds
penis vacuum pumps
ed pills
overcome impotence
psychological impotence
impotence device
impotence medicine
herbal impotence remedy
sex drive booster
bigger natural penis size enhancement
bigger penis naturally
enlargement penis pump
fast penis growth
natural penis enlarger
herbal penis pills
supplements to increase penis size
remedies for small penis
small penis pills
male sterility
male sterility treatment
buy herbal
how increase penis
how to increase penis naturally
how increase penis size
sperm motility
low semen volume
buy caliplus
buy maxocum
buy duramale
buy vigaplus
impotence
erectile
erectile dysfunction
penis enlargementpenis
premature ejaculation
buy viagr
buy levita
agree that the issue of climate change is the defining issue of our time and may be the defining issue for the well-being of generations to come. It's critically important that we get the facts right," said John Hagan, the president of the center.
The two-hour hearing, which was attended by about 200 people, was anticipated to be contentious. However, it remained civil as the ecologists, biologists and others involved in the study outlined what key questions they will try to answer in the research.
When trees are growing, they absorb carbon dioxide, a primary greenhouse gas. But when wood is burned, carbon dioxide is released into the atmosphere. In what circumstances is the net contribution of carbon to the atmosphere minimal?
Thomas Walker, a natural resource economist who will be the overall project manager for the study, said, "Initially, there was a view that biomass is a renewable fuel and that automatically, it must be good for climate change. More recently, that view has begun to change."
Newer studies are finding that the carbon contribution of biomass depends on how a biomass plant is operated - how the wood is harvested, what kind of technology is used and what kind of fuel biomass energy is replacing, he said.
"You can't really generalize about this. It depends very much on the specifics of your situation," Walker said. "And no one (has studied the issues for) Massachusetts and essentially, that is what we're proposing to look at."
The plants in Russell and Greenfield plan to burn so-called clean wood, which is generally wood scraps and cut wood from logging operations. The plant in Springfield had planned to burn construction and demolition debris as well as some clean wood.
Last week, the state suspended the review of permit applications for facilities proposing to burn construction and demolition debris to create energy, until an environmental impact assessment is completed.
Two weeks ago, the state suspended consideration of applications by biomass plants for renewable energy credits, which are considered critical to the financing of the plants, until the Manomet study is completed. That decision affected the plants in Russell and Greenfield. Developers of the plant in Springfield have not applied for the credits.
In a public hearing at the Holiday Inn here, details were offered of a landmark research study that will try to gauge the impacts of biomass energy on the climate as well as on the forests of Massachusetts.
With three proposals for industrial-scale wood-burning power plants in the Pioneer Valley, in Springfield, Greenfield and Russell, the six-month study was commissioned in November by the state Department of Energy Resources. It will be conducted by the Manomet Center for Conservation Sciences, a non-profit research center based in Plymouth.
"I think most of us agree that the issue of climate change is the defining issue of our time and may be the defining issue for the well-being of generations to come. It's critically important that we get the facts right," said John Hagan, the president of the center.
The two-hour hearing, which was attended by about 200 people, was anticipated to be contentious. However, it remained civil as the ecologists, biologists and others involved in the study outlined what key questions they will try to answer in the research.
When trees are growing, they absorb carbon dioxide, a primary greenhouse gas. But when wood is burned, carbon dioxide is released into the atmosphere. In what circumstances is the net contribution of carbon to the atmosphere minimal?
Thomas Walker, a natural resource economist who will be the overall project manager for the study, said, "Initially, there was a view that biomass is a renewable fuel and that automatically, it must be good for climate change. More recently, that view has begun to change."
Newer studies are finding that the carbon contribution of biomass depends on how a biomass plant is operated - how the wood is harvested, what kind of technology is used and what kind of fuel biomass energy is replacing, he said.
"You can't really generalize about this. It depends very much on the specifics of your situation," Walker said. "And no one (has studied the issues for) Massachusetts and essentially, that is what we're proposing to look at."
The plants in Russell and Greenfield plan to burn so-called clean wood, which is generally wood scraps and cut wood from logging operations. The plant in Springfield had planned to burn construction and demolition debris as well as some clean wood.
Last week, the state suspended the review of permit applications for facilities proposing to burn construction and demolition debris to create energy, until an environmental impact assessment is completed.
Two weeks ago, the state suspended consideration of applications by biomass plants for renewable energy credits, which are considered critical to the financing of the plants, until the Manomet study is completed. That decision affected the plants in Russell and Greenfield. Developers of the plant in Springfield have not applied for the credits.
In a public hearing at the Holiday Inn here, details were offered of a landmark research study that will try to gauge the impacts of biomass energy on the climate as well as on the forests of Massachusetts.
With three proposals for industrial-scale wood-burning power plants in the Pioneer Valley, in Springfield, Greenfield and Russell, the six-month study was commissioned in November by the state Department of Energy Resources. It will be conducted by the Manomet Center for Conservation Sciences, a non-profit research center based in Plymouth.
"I think most of us agree that the issue of climate change is the defining issue of our time and may be the defining issue for the well-being of generations to come. It's critically important that we get the facts right," said John Hagan, the president of the center.
The two-hour hearing, which was attended by about 200 people, was anticipated to be contentious. However, it remained civil as the ecologists, biologists and others involved in the study outlined what key questions they will try to answer in the research.
When trees are growing, they absorb carbon dioxide, a primary greenhouse gas. But when wood is burned, carbon dioxide is released into the atmosphere. In what circumstances is the net contribution of carbon to the atmosphere minimal?
Thomas Walker, a natural resource economist who will be the overall project manager for the study, said, "Initially, there was a view that biomass is a renewable fuel and that automatically, it must be good for climate change. More recently, that view has begun to change."
Newer studies are finding that the carbon contribution of biomass depends on how a biomass plant is operated - how the wood is harvested, what kind of technology is used and what kind of fuel biomass energy is replacing, he said.
"You can't really generalize about this. It depends very much on the specifics of your situation," Walker said. "And no one (has studied the issues for) Massachusetts and essentially, that is what we're proposing to look at."
The plants in Russell and Greenfield plan to burn so-called clean wood, which is generally wood scraps and cut wood from logging operations. The plant in Springfield had planned to burn construction and demolition debris as well as some clean wood.
Last week, the state suspended the review of permit applications for facilities proposing to burn construction and demolition debris to create energy, until an environmental impact assessment is completed.
Two weeks ago, the state suspended consideration of applications by biomass plants for renewable energy credits, which are considered critical to the financing of the plants, until the Manomet study is completed. That decision affected the plants in Russell and Greenfield. Developers of the plant in Springfield have not applied for the credits.
Copyright ©2009 MassLive.com LLC